Social Services

In our case we had a visit from two Social Workers early on in the case, they came and went, and we heard nothing more for some time. Their arrival was probably worse than that of the Police (which had been expected as there had been a death). Obviously with high profile cases in the past when Social Services come in and break up families, their arrival caused us some stress. So be prepared, they will or should visit.

The Police recommended that we co-operate with Social Services, when they turn up, and as we had nothing to hide, we did so, albeit with some grave nagging concerns. However we needn’t have worried as we saw nothing of them for many months, eventually a lady turned up, a consultant Social Worker, who came and after stating she was happy, went.

Again some time later another Social Worker, from the worryingly named Serious Case Team, turned up. This led to the start of what the SS refer to as a Core Assessment this looks at a variety of things affecting you and your family. More on the Core Assessment, will be covered later on.

Again we co-operated, but we kept our two children away as much as possible to protect them from the ‘System’. This was also true of the Police and all the other’s, try if you can to minimise the impact on your family, those representing the ‘system’ are more worried about their futures than your children’s in my view.

Anyway the Core Assessment once started is due to be completed in 35 days. Ours was way over that, depending on when you consider it to have started. So keep an eye on the calendar.

Some of the things covered include your child hood, when you met your partner, if relevant, your job, parents etc etc. It can be quite probing, and you could find it draining. They may well speak to you on your own and not with your partner. Also in relation to your children again they want to speak to them alone, which I find very scary, that a child be left alone with an adult who may well ask them leading questions, or questions that may affect any legal proceedings (remember that if the Police ask Social Services for info from their observations, SS are obliged to assist with the enquiry).

However if your child elects not to speak to the SS, then your child can be given their own solicitor and they can speak through them or not.

If however you refuse to let the SS speak to your child (children), then they can take legal advice, bear in mind if they feel your child is at risk, then things, could get very interesting (for all the wrong reasons). However it is the Police who actually have the Powers to take children away.

When the SS came round to us (with a supervisor) they stated that they ‘need to speak to the children now’. Just to remind you of the games people play sometimes with words, having a ‘Need’ and the ‘Right’ (within the Law) to speak to the Children are two entirely different things.

During our Core Assessment we were asked what would we do if my wife were committed of the offence? Now we found out later that they can’t do this apparently. An example given to us by an ex Senior Social Worker, is that if you or your partner died (in a car accident for example), they (the SS) can’t come over and ask what are your plans now you have lost a partner. The same was said of this, they can ask, but you don’t have to answer. What upset us more was it seemed to be a done deal, ‘when’ your wife is…

Innocent till proven guilty (in a court of law and not by a Social Worker)

I would recommend taking notes or getting someone else to take notes of what goes on, you can request a copy of all the paperwork Social Services raise on you. But when we asked there was a note saying they could, ‘could’ charge you in our case £10! Talk about insult to injury, not only do your taxes pay for them to come round and cause chaos in your life, but then they want to charge you for the paperwork that you helped them create. Nice work if you can get it! If they make you pay, try charging them for your time; of the family tree they often want compiling.

The Social Services have, No Powers to search, interview, or detain. You can always ask them to leave if in your home.

The Burden of proof shifts with the SS they wouldn’t have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that you may harm your child. They have a much lower burden of proof which states more to the ethos of if we think there is a risk…

If the SS identified what they thought was a risk, they could then take the children away, they say its not as bad nowadays as it was, albeit on some websites they mention certain counties takes thousands of kids away others a lot less. It depends on a whole host of factors no doubt. But something you may want to look into. There is a saying ‘know your enemy’, whilst they (the SS) may not be shooting at you, you need to remain aware.

The next level can include a panel made up of you, your partner, the children’s teachers, the Police, SS, and various other people like the local Priest or possibly other Community individuals.

We have just had a Meeting and we were surprised and angry to find that apart from the initial 12 people we were told would or could attend there was another 12, that we have never heard of or met. We felt truly ambushed by this, no one explained why they didn’t tell us about the extra names. We also had a ‘student’ social worker attend the session, who we were asked if we minded attend for their development. It would have been a bit hard to say no as the person was in front of us and we could have given the impression we weren’t being helpful.

Thankfully for our children and us the panel, decided against putting our children on the Child Protection Register, which would have allowed them to come in and ask to visit on a regular basis. But to go on the Child Protection register the panel of experts, have to believe that there is a ‘Significant’ Risk of Harm to your Children. There are also four reasons that start the process and they are that you children are at risk from:

1. Sexual Abuse
2. Emotional Abuse
3. Physical Abuse
4. Neglect

There are some guidelines as to what each one could include, and they were shown to us during the meeting.

The meeting was chaired by an Independent (of your case and people working on it) Chair person. Who introduced themselves and explained the process of the meeting. When the meeting starts everyone gets a chance to introduce themselves.

After everyone has had their, own turn to speak, you are then allowed a chance to respond. So use it to correct any inaccuracies.

The level they selected was called the Children in Need process, a lot lower level apparently than the Child Protection Register. However under the S.17 of the Children’s Act 1989 there are three legal criteria to use. They include

a). He/she is unlikely to achieve or maintain a reasonable standard of health or development without the provision of services.
b). His/her development is likely to be significantly impaired without the provision of services.
c). He/she is disabled

Note A & B are conditional upon a belief that the provision of a service making a positive difference.

We still await to see which one the SS have decided to use to justify their continued activities with our family.

If the SS were considering removing your children I read an article on another web page set up by someone who did have their children removed by the SS by all accounts. They recommended that you hand over care of your children to Grand Parents, God Parents, in an effort to stop your children in extreme cases, being taken away from your family and into Foster Homes. This maybe something to discuss with your legal team, if it becomes an issue for you.